On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote: > On 07/16/2013 01:47 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The other IDTs don't need to be page aligned, but I marked them that >> way in the clean up because it seemed sensible to define these tables >> similarly. I can change the others to be __cacheline_aligned_bss if >> that's desired. >> > > I'm fine keeping them as page aligned. They are page-sized on x86-64 > anyway (half page on i386). ok, then should change > +/* No need to be aligned, but done to keep all IDTs defined the same way. */ > +gate_desc trace_idt_table[NR_VECTORS] __page_aligned_bss; ==> > +/* Only need to be cacheline aligned, but keep all IDTs defined the same way > to be page aligned. */ > +gate_desc trace_idt_table[NR_VECTORS] __page_aligned_bss; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
