(2013/07/17 3:56), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Hello. > > Completely untested and _incomplete_. This ignores instance_delete() > and ftrace_event_format_fops, at least. > > But I am not going to even try to finish this series unless you tell > me that you agree with this approach. > > I have no idea what else could I miss. I probably understand no more > than 1% of this code, I won't be surprized if this can't work. > > To remind, we also need other changes we are discussing.
At a glance, you're trying to change which operation will be failed. Currently, user can not remove an event while someone opens files which related to the event. And this approach changes that the someone can remove the event even if the files are opened (and read/write operation will be failed). Am I understand correctly? Thank you, -- Masami HIRAMATSU IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
