On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/17/13 15:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > >> On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote: > >>>> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and > >>>> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt > >>>> is wrong. > > And that's a likely outcome in the real world. > > > >>> Ok. How about this? > >> Any comments? > > What about this instead: > > Unfortunately arm64 doesn't have SMP_ON_UP.
And why does that matter? > It sounds like you preferred the first patch using num_possible_cpus() Probably, yes. I didn't follow the early conversation though. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
