On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yes the stock kernel. yep you are right. i had this fixed too at a certain point, there is one subtle issue: under certain circumstances tasklets re-activate the tasklet softirq(s) from within the softirq handler, which leads to infinite loops if we just naively restart softirq handling. This fix is not in the -B0 patch yet. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.... Ingo Molnar
- [patch] softirq-2.4.5-A1 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug... David S. Miller
- Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-B0 David S. Miller
- Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-B0 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance... Andrea Arcangeli
- Ingo Molnar