On 7/23/2013 6:33 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 17:17 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: >> On 7/23/2013 5:00 PM, James Bottomley wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:50 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: >>>>> The slot->response value may not be aligned, so should be read >>>>> using the appropriate kernel "unaligned" accessor. >>> Hm, institutional memory re-presenting the wrong patch? However, I am >>> reminded to push the right one in spite of no ack from marvell. >> You may be right; the original author of that patch is not me, but someone >> else here at Tilera. >> >> That said, the version I pushed is effectively the version we have in the >> tip of our tree, so if we've ended up carrying the wrong patch, that's bad! >> Let me know what the right patch is that you have - thanks. > This is what I have.
Thanks, I've merged the optimization back into our tree :-) -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
