Hello, Shaohua. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:24:12PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > copy_workqueue_attrs() forgets to copy no_numa field.
Explaining how that affects things and how the behavior changes afterwards would be nice. As it currently stands, I don't know why you're submitting this patch. Is this a bug fix? Just a consistency update? Should it be marked with -stable? Please put more effort into patch descriptions and also note that ->no_numa isn't a pool attribute as noted in the comment above struct workqueue_attrs definition. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
