On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:08:55PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >
> > - if (!pte_none(*pte))
> > + ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff);
> > +
> > + if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
> > + if (pte_present(*pte) &&
> > + pte_soft_dirty(*pte))
>
> I think there's no need in wrapping every such if () inside #ifdef CONFIG_...,
> since the pte_soft_dirty() routine itself would be 0 for non-soft-dirty case
> and compiler would optimize this code out.
If only I'm not missing something obvious, this code compiles not only on x86,
CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depends on x86 (otherwise I'll have to implement
pte_soft_dirty for all archs).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
