On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:44:11AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:40:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Subject: sched, numa: migrates_degrades_locality() > > From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > > Date: Mon Jul 22 14:02:54 CEST 2013 > > > > It just makes heaps of sense; so add it and make both it and > > migrate_improve_locality() a sched_feat(). > > > > Ok. I'll be splitting this patch and merging part of it into "sched: > Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node" and keeping the > degrades_locality as a separate patch. I'm also not a fan of the > tunables names NUMA_FAULTS_UP and NUMA_FAULTS_DOWN because it is hard to > guess what they mean. NUMA_FAVOUR_HIGHER, NUMA_RESIST_LOWER?
Sure, I don't much care about the names.. ideally you'd never use them anyway ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
