Hi Arnd,

Thanks for the replies. I think what you mention should now be fixed.

Except one thing where I still have questions:

On 29 July 2013 18:35, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> You must not override the "dest_req_no" and "dest_req_no" in 
> moxart_slave_config
> since they are already set by the ->xlate() function and the driver calling
> slave_config generally has no knowledge of what the slave id is.

MMC now has a device tree node:

mmc: mmc@98e00000 {
compatible = "moxa,moxart-mmc";
reg = <0x98e00000 0x5C>;
interrupts = <5 0>;
clocks = <&coreclk>;
dmas = <&dma 0>,
            <&dma 1>;
dma-names = "tx", "rx";
};

.. where the driver requests channel 0-1 and sets cfg.slave_id =
APB_DMA_SD_REQ_NO for both.

Perhaps this is not how slave_id is intended to be used?

Maybe it would be more appropriate to have two DMA cells?

APB_DMA_SD_REQ_NO can then be moved from driver code to DT.

Best regards,
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to