On 08/02/2013 08:08 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 2 August 2013 19:01, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: >> Care to add a changelog? >> >> I'll apply this on top of my $subject patch, then. > > I thought you will merge this one with your patch, but there is no > harm in getting one more on my name :) > > Changelog is (patch attached): > > From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:17:33 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Pass policy to cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() > > Caller of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() already has pointer to policy structure and > so there is no need to find it again in cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(). Lets pass it > directly. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > ---
The patch looks good. Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]> Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
