From: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:34:07 -0400

> On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:14:34 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
>> 
>> selinux has some similar definition like union inet_addr,
>> it can re-use the generic union inet_addr too.
>> 
>> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> 
> Perhaps I'm confusing this with another patch but I though DaveM said he 
> wasn't going to merge these patches?

I didn't like how he added completely unused bloat to various
datastructures because he unconditionally put a port field into
there.

He removed that problem this time, but there are still a lot of
things I don't like about this patch series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to