On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > It's that time of the week again.. > > "You apply 339 patches, what do you get > Another week older and deeper in debt > Saint Peter don't you call me 'cause I can't go > I owe my soul to the company store" > > I had hoped things would start calming down, but rc4 is pretty much > exactly the same size as rc3 was. That said, the patches seem a bit > more spread out, and less interesting - which is a good thing. Boring > is good. Let's keep it that way, and try to make for fewer patches for > -rc5, ok? Because we are past half-way now, and I really want to see > just fixes. > > We've got some arch updates (arm, parisc), but most of this is drivers > (mostly networking, usb and some drm updates). There's also some core > networking changes. And the printk code movement looks big if you > don't do git renames (ie like the patches I upload).
I found a regression while running all v3.11-rcX kernels; Starcract II through wine crashes. The culprit is fab840f (ptrace: PTRACE_DETACH should do flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(child)), I revert that commit and there's no crash. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
