Thank you for your reply in details, especially you are very busy.

My original opinion about optimization is incorrect.

Thanks.

On 08/07/2013 05:43 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com> wrote:
> 
>> Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
>> clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
> 
> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
> 
>       ret = -ENOMEM;
>       foo = alloc(...);
>       if (!foo)
>               goto out;
> 
> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
> 
>       foo = alloc(...);
>       if (!foo) {
>               ret = -ENOMEM;
>               goto out;
>       }
> 
> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
> life of me I can't remember why :(
> 
> Your patch switches from old-style to new-style.  And it appears to
> have increased the text size.  I did this, to switch three sites back
> to old-style:
> 
> --- 
> a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c~kernel-sysctl_binaryc-improve-the-usage-of-return-value-result-fix
> +++ a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> @@ -941,17 +941,15 @@ static ssize_t bin_string(struct file *f
>               copied = result;
>               lastp = oldval + copied - 1;
>  
> -             if (get_user(ch, lastp)) {
> -                     result = -EFAULT;
> +             result = -EFAULT;
> +             if (get_user(ch, lastp))
>                       goto out;
> -             }
>  
>               /* Trim off the trailing newline */
>               if (ch == '\n') {
> -                     if (put_user('\0', lastp)) {
> -                             result = -EFAULT;
> +                     result = -EFAULT;
> +                     if (put_user('\0', lastp))
>                               goto out;
> -                     }
>                       copied -= 1;
>               }
>       }
> @@ -976,11 +974,10 @@ static ssize_t bin_intvec(struct file *f
>       char *buffer;
>       ssize_t result;
>  
> +     result = -ENOMEM;
>       buffer = kmalloc(BUFSZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!buffer) {
> -             result = -ENOMEM;
> +     if (!buffer)
>               goto out;
> -     }
>  
>       if (oldval && oldlen) {
>               unsigned __user *vec = oldval;
> _
> 
> and kernel/sysctl_binary.o's .text got six bytes smaller.
> 
> Now, smaller text doesn't mean faster code.  But it probably means
> larger cache footprint, which can mean slower code.
> 
> IOW, it isn't obvious that this was an improvement.
> 
> 


-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to