L. K. writes: > Why not make it in Celsius ? Is more easy to read it this way. No, because then the software must handle negative numbers for cooled computers. CentiKelvin is fine. Do C=cK/100-273.15 if you really must... but you still have a number that is useless to a human. Humans need a seconds-to-destruction value or an alarm. Negative temperatures do not really exist. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- es1371 compile issue in 2.4.5-ac9 Alan Olsen
- Re: es1371 compile issue in 2.4.5-ac9 Keith Owens
- Re: temperature standard - global config optio... Pavel Machek
- Re: temperature standard - global config ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: temperature standard - global con... Philips
- Re: temperature standard - global... L. K.
- Re: temperature standard - gl... David Rees
- Re: temperature standard... Chris Boot
- Re: temperature standard... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: temperature standard - gl... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: temperature standard... L. K.
- Re: temperature standard... mirabilos {Thorsten Glaser}
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: temperature standard... Thomas Speck
- Re: temperature standard... Chris Boot
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: temperature standard... J . A . Magallon
- Re: temperature standard... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: temperature standard... J . A . Magallon
- Re: temperature standard... Albert D. Cahalan