Hi Paul, On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Paul Turner <p...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:45:12PM +0800, Lei Wen wrote: >>> > Not quite right; I think you need busiest->cfs.h_nr_running. >>> > cfs.nr_running is the number of entries running in this 'group'. If >>> > you've got nested groups like: >>> > >>> > 'root' >>> > \ >>> > 'A' >>> > / \ >>> > t1 t2 >>> > >>> > root.nr_running := 1 'A', even though you've got multiple running tasks. >>> > >>> >>> You're absolutely right for this. :) >>> I miss it for not considering the group case... >>> >>> Then do you think it is necessary to do below change in load_balance() code? >>> - if (busiest->nr_running > 1) { >>> + if (busiest->cfs.h_nr_running > 1) { >>> >> >> Yes I think that would be fine. > > If we pivot to use h_nr_running we should probably also update > call-sites such as cpu_load_avg_per_task() for consistency.
I didn't find cpu_load_avg_per_task in the latest linux git... Is it a new patch pending while not being submitted? Thanks, Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/