On 08/15/2013 03:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote:
But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so,
we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up.
Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today
I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's
when they show up.
Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct
irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing.
It's only one extra line...
Ok if Russel accepts it ...
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
