On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Mikulas' point is that you cannot reduce the size to smaller than 1. > And aside from rq-based DM, 1 is sufficient to allow for forward > progress even when memory is completely consumed. > > A patch that simply changes them to 1 but makes the rq-based DM > mempool's size configurable should actually be fine. Yes, I think it would be viable. Mikulas > Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
