On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Lars Poeschel <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel <[email protected]> > > The device tree property should be more descriptive. > microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. As there are no > in tree users of this property, so the rename can still be > done without pain. > > Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <[email protected]> So do I apply this to the GPIO tree now or what? Are the DT custodians happy? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
