The basic idea is from nulls list which uses a nulls to indicate
whether the desc is moved to different pte-list

Note, we should do bottom-up walk in the desc since we always move
the bottom entry to the deleted position. A desc only has 3 entries
in the current code so it is not a problem now, but the issue will
be triggered if we expend the size of desc in the further development

Thanks to SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, the desc can be quickly reused

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index c5f1b27..3e1432f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -975,6 +975,10 @@ static int count_spte_number(struct pte_list_desc *desc)
        return first_free + desc_num * PTE_LIST_EXT;
 }
 
+#define rcu_assign_pte_list(pte_list_p, value)                         \
+       rcu_assign_pointer(*(unsigned long __rcu **)(pte_list_p),       \
+                       (unsigned long *)(value))
+
 /*
  * Pte mapping structures:
  *
@@ -994,7 +998,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
 
        if (!*pte_list) {
                rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx 0->1\n", spte, *spte);
-               *pte_list = (unsigned long)spte;
+               rcu_assign_pte_list(pte_list, spte);
                return 0;
        }
 
@@ -1004,7 +1008,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
                desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)*pte_list;
                desc->sptes[1] = spte;
                desc_mark_nulls(pte_list, desc);
-               *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc | 1;
+               rcu_assign_pte_list(pte_list, (unsigned long)desc | 1);
                return 1;
        }
 
@@ -1017,7 +1021,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
                new_desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
                new_desc->more = desc;
                desc = new_desc;
-               *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc | 1;
+               rcu_assign_pte_list(pte_list, (unsigned long)desc | 1);
        }
 
        free_pos = find_first_free(desc);
@@ -1125,6 +1129,51 @@ static void pte_list_walk(unsigned long *pte_list, 
pte_list_walk_fn fn)
        WARN_ON(desc_get_nulls_value(desc) != pte_list);
 }
 
+/* The caller should hold rcu lock. */
+static void pte_list_walk_lockless(unsigned long *pte_list,
+                                  pte_list_walk_fn fn)
+{
+       struct pte_list_desc *desc;
+       unsigned long pte_list_value;
+       int i;
+
+restart:
+       /*
+        * Force the pte_list to be reloaded.
+        *
+        * See the comments in hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu().
+        */
+       barrier();
+       pte_list_value = *rcu_dereference(pte_list);
+       if (!pte_list_value)
+               return;
+
+       if (!(pte_list_value & 1))
+               return fn((u64 *)pte_list_value);
+
+       desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(pte_list_value & ~1ul);
+       while (!desc_is_a_nulls(desc)) {
+               /*
+                * We should do top-down walk since we always use the higher
+                * indices to replace the deleted entry if only one desc is
+                * used in the rmap when a spte is removed. Otherwise the
+                * moved entry will be missed.
+                */
+               for (i = PTE_LIST_EXT - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+                       if (desc->sptes[i])
+                               fn(desc->sptes[i]);
+
+               desc = rcu_dereference(desc->more);
+
+               /* It is being initialized. */
+               if (unlikely(!desc))
+                       goto restart;
+       }
+
+       if (unlikely(desc_get_nulls_value(desc) != pte_list))
+               goto restart;
+}
+
 static unsigned long *__gfn_to_rmap(gfn_t gfn, int level,
                                    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 {
@@ -4651,7 +4700,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_module_init(void)
 {
        pte_list_desc_cache = kmem_cache_create("pte_list_desc",
                                            sizeof(struct pte_list_desc),
-                                           0, 0, NULL);
+                                           0, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, NULL);
        if (!pte_list_desc_cache)
                goto nomem;
 
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to