Use the likely mechanism already around valid pointer tests to better choose when to memset to 0 allocations with __GFP_ZERO
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]> --- mm/slab.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index 2580db0..94e7e54 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -3392,11 +3392,11 @@ slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags, int nodeid, kmemleak_alloc_recursive(ptr, cachep->object_size, 1, cachep->flags, flags); - if (likely(ptr)) + if (likely(ptr)) { kmemcheck_slab_alloc(cachep, flags, ptr, cachep->object_size); - - if (unlikely((flags & __GFP_ZERO) && ptr)) - memset(ptr, 0, cachep->object_size); + if (unlikely(flags & __GFP_ZERO)) + memset(ptr, 0, cachep->object_size); + } return ptr; } @@ -3457,11 +3457,11 @@ slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags, unsigned long caller) flags); prefetchw(objp); - if (likely(objp)) + if (likely(objp)) { kmemcheck_slab_alloc(cachep, flags, objp, cachep->object_size); - - if (unlikely((flags & __GFP_ZERO) && objp)) - memset(objp, 0, cachep->object_size); + if (unlikely(flags & __GFP_ZERO)) + memset(objp, 0, cachep->object_size); + } return objp; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
