Re: correction: fs/buffer.c underlocking async pages

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> I think the patch is ok. We must have a way to track down which bh are
> actually getting read,

We _do_ have a way. The way is called "bh->b_end_io == end_io_async".

What's the problem with the existing code, and why do people want to add a
(unnecessary) new bit?

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/