Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However, the very concept of Java encourages not caring about > > "performance, system-design or any elegance whatsoever". > The same arguments were made 30 years ago about writing the OS in a high > level language like C rather than in raw assembly. 30 years ago we didn't have C compilers that produce better code than you can write by hand. ;) -- Adam Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://azz.us-lot.org/> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Martin Dalecki
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Rob Landley
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Pete Zaitcev
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Rob Landley
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Rob Landley
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Jonathan Morton
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Pete Zaitcev
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Rob Landley
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Adam Sampson
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java William T Wilson
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Russell Leighton
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Tony Hoyle
- Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Dan Kegel

