On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> On 09/10/13 13:49, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Gets rid of those unnecessary gotos.
> 
> Unfortunately it introduced a bug whilst it is at it.  Sometimes
> those gotos are necessary and the 'right' way to do things.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 17 +++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c 
> > b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> > index 8c4c54c..148f0e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> > @@ -331,26 +331,23 @@ static int st_sensors_read_axis_data(struct iio_dev 
> > *indio_dev,
> >     unsigned int byte_for_channel = ch->scan_type.storagebits >> 3;
> >  
> >     outdata = kmalloc(byte_for_channel, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -   if (!outdata) {
> > -           err = -EINVAL;
> > -           goto st_sensors_read_axis_data_error;
> > -   }
> > +   if (!outdata)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> I agree this change makes complete sense.
> >  
> >     err = sdata->tf->read_multiple_byte(&sdata->tb, sdata->dev,
> >                             ch->address, byte_for_channel,
> >                             outdata, sdata->multiread_bit);
> > -   if (err < 0)
> > -           goto st_sensors_free_memory;
> > +   if (err < 0) {
> > +           kfree(outdata);
> > +           return err;
> > +   }
> I don't like this change as....
> >  
> >     if (byte_for_channel == 2)
> >             *data = (s16)get_unaligned_le16(outdata);
> >     else if (byte_for_channel == 3)
> >             *data = (s32)st_sensors_get_unaligned_le24(outdata);
> >  
> > -st_sensors_free_memory:
> > -   kfree(outdata);
> you now don't free out data in the case of no error.  This is precisely the 
> case
> where a goto is the correct way to handle things as the free need to occur 
> whether
> or not the error occurs.

Ah, you're quite right. I'll fix up.

> > -st_sensors_read_axis_data_error:
> > -   return err;
> > +   return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  int st_sensors_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to