On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:23:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 09/17/13 03:32, Mark Brown wrote: > > /** means kernel-doc syntax and it was not in proper kernel-doc format, > > but maybe it could just be a Warning instead of a fatal Error. > > Yes, that's what I'm saying - it really doesn't seem like something that > should be a fatal error, that's far too fragile. > > > Ideally we should pick it up in -next, of course, but I doubt that anyone > > is running kernel-doc on linux-next. I used to do that, but there are > > too many errors/warnings. I suppose that I could just concentrate on > > (fatal) Errors in linux-next and ignore the Warnings. > > Could these checks be added to Fengguang's tester? If nobody's looking > at the output (I've never found the processed output useful myself) or > running the tool then it's a bit worrying...
Yes, I'm running "make htmldocs" checks and send out all new warnings: Sep 03 To Mark Brown ( 19:0) [regulator:topic/devm 5/15] Warning(drivers/regulator/core.c:3750): No description found for parameter 'dev' Sep 06 To Miklos Szere ( 20:0) [vfs:for-miklos 34/43] Warning(fs/dcache.c:1167): No description found for parameter 'data' Sep 10 To Waiman Long ( 22:0) [vfs:for-next 9/10] Warning(fs/dcache.c:102): No description found for parameter 'lock' Sep 11 To Lars-Peter C ( 25:0) [xlnx:master-next 96/99] Warning(drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:1061): No description found for parameter 'data' Sep 12 To Brian Norris ( 13:0) [l2-mtd:master 9/11] Warning(include/linux/mtd/nand.h:587): Excess struct/union/enum/typedef member 'ecclayout' Does that sound enough? Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
