Changelog:
 *v4 -> v5: return directly for !VM_VM_AREA case and remove (VM_LAZY_FREE | 
VM_LAZY_FREEING) check 
 *v5 -> v6: add KOSAKI's ack 

There is a race window between vmap_area tear down and show vmap_area 
information.

        A                                                B

remove_vm_area
spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
va->vm = NULL;
va->flags &= ~VM_VM_AREA;
spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
                                                spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
                                                if (va->flags & (VM_LAZY_FREE | 
VM_LAZY_FREEZING))
                                                        return 0;
                                                if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA)) {
                                                        seq_printf(m, 
"0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
                                                                (void 
*)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
                                                                va->va_end - 
va->va_start);
                                                        return 0;
                                                }
free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
        flush_cache_vunmap
        free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush
                unmap_vmap_area
                free_vmap_area_noflush
                        va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREE 

The assumption !VM_VM_AREA represents vm_map_ram allocation is introduced by 
commit: d4033afd(mm, vmalloc: iterate vmap_area_list, instead of vmlist, in 
vmallocinfo()). However, !VM_VM_AREA also represents vmap_area is being tear 
down in race window mentioned above. This patch fix it by don't dump any 
information for !VM_VM_AREA case and also remove (VM_LAZY_FREE | 
VM_LAZY_FREEING)
check since they are not possible for !VM_VM_AREA case.

Suggested-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 5368b17..9b75028 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2582,16 +2582,13 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
 {
        struct vmap_area *va = p;
        struct vm_struct *v;
-
-       if (va->flags & (VM_LAZY_FREE | VM_LAZY_FREEING))
-               return 0;
-
-       if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA)) {
-               seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
-                       (void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
-                                       va->va_end - va->va_start);
+
+       /*
+        * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !VM_VM_AREA on
+        * behalf of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation.
+        */
+       if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA))
                return 0;
-       }
 
        v = va->vm;
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to