On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:16:28PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> +     if (!rdev->desc->ops->set_current_limit ||
> +                     !rdev->desc->ops->get_current_limit)
> +             return 0;
> +

The indentation here is odd and we probably ought to complain if someone
tries to set a current constarint on a regulator that doesn't support
the operation, if only to avoid surprises later on when the limits don't
take effect.

> +     current_uA = rdev->desc->ops->get_current_limit(rdev);
> +     if (current_uA < rdev->constraints->min_uA ||
> +                     current_uA > rdev->constraints->max_uA) {
> +             ret = rdev->desc->ops->set_current_limit(rdev,
> +                             rdev->constraints->min_uA,
> +                             rdev->constraints->max_uA);
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     rdev_err(rdev,
> +                             "Failed to set current constraint, %d\n", ret);
> +                     return ret;
> +             }

Why is this conditional on the existing setting?  Just apply the
constraint.

> +     }
> +     return 0;

Missing blank.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to