On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 11:51 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way > that we can easily add subsystems. > > To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs > and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling > it.
Maybe adding a mechanism to MAINTAINERS would be better. Maybe a default B: (backport?) of [email protected] with a per-subsystem override? SUBSYSTEM TYPE M: [email protected] L: [email protected] S: Supported F: file/pattern/ B: [email protected] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
