Before this patch, looking at 'perf bench sched pipe' behavior over 'top' 
only told us that something related to perf is running:

      PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
    19934 mingo     20   0 54836 1296  952 R 18.6  0.0   0:00.56 perf
    19935 mingo     20   0 54836  384   36 S 18.6  0.0   0:00.56 perf

After the patch it's clearly visible what's going on:

      PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
    19744 mingo     20   0  125m 3536 2644 R 68.2  0.0   0:01.12 sched-pipe
    19745 mingo     20   0  125m 1172  276 R 68.2  0.0   0:01.12 sched-pipe

The benchmark-subsystem name is concatenated with the individual testcase 
name.

Unfortunately 'perf top' does not show the reconfigured name, possibly 
because it caches ->comm[] values and does not recognize changes to them?

[ Also clean up a few bits in builtin-bench.c while at it. ]

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-bench.c |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Index: linux/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c
+++ linux/tools/perf/builtin-bench.c
@@ -1,21 +1,18 @@
 /*
- *
  * builtin-bench.c
  *
  * General benchmarking subsystem provided by perf
  *
  * Copyright (C) 2009, Hitoshi Mitake <[email protected]>
- *
  */
 
 /*
- *
  * Available subsystem list:
+ *
  *  sched ... scheduler and IPC mechanism
  *  mem   ... memory access performance
- *
+ *  numa  ... NUMA placement performance measurements
  */
-
 #include "perf.h"
 #include "util/util.h"
 #include "util/parse-options.h"
@@ -25,11 +22,14 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+
+typedef int (*bench_fn_t)(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix);
 
 struct bench_suite {
        const char *name;
        const char *summary;
-       int (*fn)(int, const char **, const char *);
+       bench_fn_t fn;
 };
                                                \
 /* sentinel: easy for help */
@@ -103,16 +103,14 @@ static void dump_suites(int subsys_index
 {
        int i;
 
-       printf("# List of available suites for %s...\n\n",
-              subsystems[subsys_index].name);
+       printf("# List of available suites for %s...\n\n", 
subsystems[subsys_index].name);
 
-       for (i = 0; subsystems[subsys_index].suites[i].name; i++)
+       for (i = 0; subsystems[subsys_index].suites[i].name; i++) {
                printf("%14s: %s\n",
                       subsystems[subsys_index].suites[i].name,
                       subsystems[subsys_index].suites[i].summary);
-
+       }
        printf("\n");
-       return;
 }
 
 static const char *bench_format_str;
@@ -159,7 +157,34 @@ static int bench_str2int(const char *str
        return BENCH_FORMAT_UNKNOWN;
 }
 
-static void all_suite(struct bench_subsys *subsys)       /* FROM HERE */
+/*
+ * Run a specific benchmark but first rename the running task's ->comm[]
+ * to something meaningful:
+ */
+static int run_bench(const char *subsys_name, const char *bench_name, 
bench_fn_t fn, int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
+{
+       int size;
+       char *name;
+       int ret;
+
+       size = strlen(subsys_name) + 1 + strlen(bench_name) + 1;
+
+       name = zalloc(size);
+       BUG_ON(!name);
+
+       scnprintf(name, size, "%s-%s", subsys_name, bench_name);
+
+       prctl(PR_SET_NAME, name);
+       argv[0] = name;
+
+       ret = fn(argc, argv, prefix);
+
+       free(name);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static void all_suites(struct bench_subsys *subsys)      /* FROM HERE */
 {
        int i;
        const char *argv[2];
@@ -179,7 +204,7 @@ static void all_suite(struct bench_subsy
                fflush(stdout);
 
                argv[1] = suites[i].name;
-               suites[i].fn(1, argv, NULL);
+               run_bench(subsys->name, suites[i].name, suites[i].fn, 1, argv, 
NULL);
                printf("\n");
        }
 }
@@ -188,7 +213,7 @@ static void all_subsystem(void)
 {
        int i;
        for (i = 0; subsystems[i].suites; i++)
-               all_suite(&subsystems[i]);
+               all_suites(&subsystems[i]);
 }
 
 int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
@@ -231,7 +256,7 @@ int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **arg
                }
 
                if (!strcmp(argv[1], "all")) {
-                       all_suite(&subsystems[i]);
+                       all_suites(&subsystems[i]);
                        goto end;
                }
 
@@ -244,8 +269,7 @@ int cmd_bench(int argc, const char **arg
                                       subsystems[i].name,
                                       subsystems[i].suites[j].name);
                        fflush(stdout);
-                       status = subsystems[i].suites[j].fn(argc - 1,
-                                                           argv + 1, prefix);
+                       status = run_bench(subsystems[i].name, 
subsystems[i].suites[j].name, subsystems[i].suites[j].fn, argc - 1, argv + 1, 
prefix);
                        goto end;
                }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to