Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> writes:
> We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
> mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
> loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure
> their own transmission steering strategy.
>
> So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when
> the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support,
> there's no need for keeping per-cpu vq_index and .ndo_select_queue(),
> so they were removed also.
>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |   55 +++++++--------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index defec2b..4102c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -127,9 +127,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>       /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
>       bool affinity_hint_set;
>  
> -     /* Per-cpu variable to show the mapping from CPU to virtqueue */
> -     int __percpu *vq_index;
> -
>       /* CPU hot plug notifier */
>       struct notifier_block nb;
>  };
> @@ -1063,7 +1060,6 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device 
> *dev,
>  static void virtnet_clean_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, long hcpu)
>  {
>       int i;
> -     int cpu;
>  
>       if (vi->affinity_hint_set) {
>               for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> @@ -1073,20 +1069,11 @@ static void virtnet_clean_affinity(struct 
> virtnet_info *vi, long hcpu)
>  
>               vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
>       }
> -
> -     i = 0;
> -     for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> -             if (cpu == hcpu) {
> -                     *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = -1;
> -             } else {
> -                     *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
> -                             ++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> -             }
> -     }
>  }
>  
>  static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
> +     cpumask_var_t cpumask;
>       int i;
>       int cpu;
>  
> @@ -1100,15 +1087,21 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info 
> *vi)
>               return;
>       }
>  
> +     if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +             return;
> +
>       i = 0;
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>               virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
>               virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
> -             *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
> +             cpumask_clear(cpumask);
> +             cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpumask);
> +             netif_set_xps_queue(vi->dev, cpumask, i);
>               i++;
>       }
>  
>       vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
> +     free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
>  }

Um, isn't this just cpumask_of(cpu)?

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to