Hi Tomi,

On 09/16/2013 12:34 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 16/09/13 13:33, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 09/16/2013 11:51 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 12/09/13 08:54, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>
>>>> @@ -394,16 +382,12 @@ static int xilinxfb_release(struct device *dev)
>>>>    /* Turn off the display */
>>>>    xilinx_fb_out32(drvdata, REG_CTRL, 0);
>>>>
>>>> -  /* Release the resources, as allocated based on interface */
>>>> -  if (drvdata->flags & BUS_ACCESS_FLAG)
>>>> -          devm_iounmap(dev, drvdata->regs);
>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_DCR
>>>> -  else
>>>> +  /* Release the resources, as allocated based on interface */
>>>> +  if (!(drvdata->flags & BUS_ACCESS_FLAG))
>>>>            dcr_unmap(drvdata->dcr_host, drvdata->dcr_len);
>>>>  #endif
>>>
>>> I might be mistaken, and it's not strictly part of this series, but
>>> shouldn't dcr_unmap be called somewhere else also, if the probe fails?
>>
>> yes. It should.
> 
> Do you want me to apply these patches as they are, or do you want to
> improve the series to include the dcr_unmap fix?

Sorry I have missed this email.

Yes please apply it as is. I don't have ppc hw here to be able to test this
change.

Thanks,
Michal


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to