On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:21:42PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:53:35PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > The warning for the irq remapping broken check in intel_irq_remapping.c is
> > pretty pointless. We need the warning, but we know where its comming from,
> > the
> > stack trace will always be the same, and it needlessly triggers things like
> > Abrt. This changes the warning to just print a text warning about BIOS
> > being
> > broken, without the stack trace, then sets the appropriate taint bit.
> > Since we
> > automatically disable irq remapping, theres no need to contiue making Abrt
> > jump
> > at this problem
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
> > CC: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> > CC: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
> > CC: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> > CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
> > CC: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
>
> Ping Bjorn, Jeorg, any thoughts here?
Yes, the patch is doing the right thing. I have it already on my list
and will merge it soon.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
