Hi Tony,

On Wednesday 09 October 2013 02:54 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Afzal Mohammed <[email protected]> [130905 04:03]:

>> -#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS    5
>> -#define MAX_IRQS            160
>> +/* maximum value correspond to that of AM43x */
>> +#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS    7
>> +#define MAX_IRQS            224
>> +#define DEFAULT_NR_REG_BANKS        5
>> +#define DEFAULT_IRQS                160
>>  #define WKG_MASK_ALL                0x00000000
>>  #define WKG_UNMASK_ALL              0xffffffff
>>  #define CPU_ENA_OFFSET              0x400
> 
> How about define it like this to avoid updating things
> in multiple places for new SoCs:
> 
> #define AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS    7
> #define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS      AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS

Yes that is better

>>      for (i = 0; i < irq_banks; i++) {
>>              wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU0_ID);
>> -            wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU1_ID);
>> +            if (!am43x)
>> +                    wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU1_ID);
>>      }
> 
> Why not use soc_is_am43xx() directly here?

Ok, it has been changed in the new version.

Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to