On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:07AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On 10/09/2013 10:40 PM, Seth Jennings wrote: > > > > The reason we never noticed this for zswap is that zswap has no > > dynamically allocated per-type resources. In the expected case, > > where all of the pages have been drained from zswap, > > zswap_frontswap_invalidate_area() is a no-op. > > > > Not exactly, see the bug fix "mm/zswap: bugfix: memory leak when > re-swapon" from Weijie. > Zswap needs invalidate_area() also.
I remembered this patch as soon as I sent out this note. What I said about zswap_frontswap_invalidate_area() being a no-op in the expected case is true as of v3.12-rc4, but it shouldn't be :) I sent a note to Andrew reminding him to pull in that patch. Thanks, Seth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
