3.5.7.23 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>

commit 88362ad8f9a6cea787420b57cc27ccacef000dbe upstream.

This was originally reported in [1] and posted by Neil Horman [2], he said:

  Fix up a missed null pointer check in the asconf code. If we don't find
  a local address, but we pass in an address length of more than 1, we may
  dereference a NULL laddr pointer. Currently this can't happen, as the only
  users of the function pass in the value 1 as the addrcnt parameter, but
  its not hot path, and it doesn't hurt to check for NULL should that ever
  be the case.

The callpath from sctp_asconf_mgmt() looks okay. But this could be triggered
from sctp_setsockopt_bindx() call with SCTP_BINDX_REM_ADDR and addrcnt > 1
while passing all possible addresses from the bind list to SCTP_BINDX_REM_ADDR
so that we do *not* find a single address in the association's bind address
list that is not in the packed array of addresses. If this happens when we
have an established association with ASCONF-capable peers, then we could get
a NULL pointer dereference as we only check for laddr == NULL && addrcnt == 1
and call later sctp_make_asconf_update_ip() with NULL laddr.

BUT: this actually won't happen as sctp_bindx_rem() will catch such a case
and return with an error earlier. As this is incredably unintuitive and error
prone, add a check to catch at least future bugs here. As Neil says, its not
hot path. Introduced by 8a07eb0a5 ("sctp: Add ASCONF operation on the
single-homed host").

 [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg02132.html
 [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg02133.html

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Michio Honda <[email protected]>
Acked-By: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 7e40284..d01802a 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -814,6 +814,9 @@ static int sctp_send_asconf_del_ip(struct sock              
*sk,
                        goto skip_mkasconf;
                }
 
+               if (laddr == NULL)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+
                /* We do not need RCU protection throughout this loop
                 * because this is done under a socket lock from the
                 * setsockopt call.
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to