On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:25:37 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > But yes, the way its set-up an arch could indeed provide __this_cup_$op > itself -- without providing the _$n variants; in which case the > raw_cpu_$op provided by you is broken. > > Can't we have a 'simple' coccinelle script rename the entire __this_cpu* > implementation over to raw_cpu* and then provide generic __this_cpu* -> > raw_cpu maps? >
Perhaps we should match the way spinlocks are. this_cpu*() be the normal use. raw_this_cpu() could perhaps not do the checks? arch_this_cpu() be the architecture specific version of this_cpu* -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
