On Thursday, October 17, 2013 02:57:12 PM Aaron Lu wrote: > On 10/16/2013 09:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > > > The mechanism causing devices depending on a given power resource > > (that is, devices that can be in D0 only if that power resource is > > on) to be resumed automatically when the power resource is turned > > on (and their "inferred" power state becomes D0 as a result) is > > inherently racy and in fact unnecessary. > > > > It is racy, because if the power resources is turned on and then > > immediately off, the device resume triggered by the first transition > > to "on" may still happen, causing the power resource to be turned > > on again. That again will trigger the "resume of dependent devices" > > mechanism, but if the devices in question are not in use, they will > > be suspended in the meantime causing the power resource to be turned > > off. However, the "resume of dependent devices" will next resume > > them again and so on. In some cases (USB port PM in particular) that > > leads to an endless busy loop of flipping the resource on and off > > continuously. > > > > It is needless, because whoever turns a power resource on will most > > likely turn it off at some point and the devices that go into "D0" > > as a result of turning it on will then go back into D3cold. > > Moreover, turning all power resources a device needs to go into > > D0 is not sufficient for a full transition into D0 in general. > > Namely, _PS0 may need to be executed in addition to that in some > > cases. This means that the whole rationale of the "resume of > > dependent devices" mechanism was incorrect to begin with and it's > > best to remove it entirely. > > With this patch, your previous patch could also be applied now: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/14/173 > [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Drop two functions that are not used any more
Good catch and that code is dead anyway AFAICS, because power_dependent is only used in device_pm.c (in those two functions) and in scan.c (where it is initialized). Thanks! > And the following ATA patch at the same time: > > From: Aaron Lu <[email protected]> > Subject: [PATCH] ata: acpi: remove power dependent device handling > > Previously, we want the SCSI device corrsponding to ATA device gets > runtime resumed when the power resource for that ATA device is turned > on by some other device, so we added the SCSI device to the dependent > device list of the ATA device's ACPI node. Since now we decided this > behavior is troublesome and hard to avoid race, this behavior has been > dropped. This patch cleans up the corresponding code in ATA ACPI layer. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 14 -------------- > drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 3 --- > drivers/ata/libata.h | 4 ---- > 3 files changed, 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c > index 4ba8b04..ab714d2 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c > @@ -1035,17 +1035,3 @@ void ata_acpi_on_disable(struct ata_device *dev) > { > ata_acpi_clear_gtf(dev); > } > - > -void ata_scsi_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev) > -{ > - acpi_handle handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(dev); > - if (handle) > - acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent(handle, &dev->sdev->sdev_gendev); > -} > - > -void ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev) > -{ > - acpi_handle handle = ata_dev_acpi_handle(dev); > - if (handle) > - acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(handle, &dev->sdev->sdev_gendev); > -} > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > index 97a0cef..db6dfcf 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > @@ -3679,7 +3679,6 @@ void ata_scsi_scan_host(struct ata_port *ap, int sync) > if (!IS_ERR(sdev)) { > dev->sdev = sdev; > scsi_device_put(sdev); > - ata_scsi_acpi_bind(dev); > } else { > dev->sdev = NULL; > } > @@ -3767,8 +3766,6 @@ static void ata_scsi_remove_dev(struct ata_device *dev) > struct scsi_device *sdev; > unsigned long flags; > > - ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(dev); > - > /* Alas, we need to grab scan_mutex to ensure SCSI device > * state doesn't change underneath us and thus > * scsi_device_get() always succeeds. The mutex locking can > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h > index eeeb778..45b5ab3 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libata.h > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h > @@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ extern void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap, > pm_message_t state); > extern void ata_acpi_bind_port(struct ata_port *ap); > extern void ata_acpi_bind_dev(struct ata_device *dev); > extern acpi_handle ata_dev_acpi_handle(struct ata_device *dev); > -extern void ata_scsi_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev); > -extern void ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev); > #else > static inline void ata_acpi_dissociate(struct ata_host *host) { } > static inline int ata_acpi_on_suspend(struct ata_port *ap) { return 0; } > @@ -133,8 +131,6 @@ static inline void ata_acpi_set_state(struct ata_port *ap, > pm_message_t state) { } > static inline void ata_acpi_bind_port(struct ata_port *ap) {} > static inline void ata_acpi_bind_dev(struct ata_device *dev) {} > -static inline void ata_scsi_acpi_bind(struct ata_device *dev) {} > -static inline void ata_scsi_acpi_unbind(struct ata_device *dev) {} > #endif > > /* libata-scsi.c */ > > > > Reported-by: Lan Tianyu <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/power.c | 100 > > --------------------------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 99 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/power.c > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/power.c > > @@ -59,16 +59,9 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("power"); > > #define ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON 0x01 > > #define ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN 0xFF > > > > -struct acpi_power_dependent_device { > > - struct list_head node; > > - struct acpi_device *adev; > > - struct work_struct work; > > -}; > > - > > struct acpi_power_resource { > > struct acpi_device device; > > struct list_head list_node; > > - struct list_head dependent; > > char *name; > > u32 system_level; > > u32 order; > > @@ -233,32 +226,6 @@ static int acpi_power_get_list_state(str > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static void acpi_power_resume_dependent(struct work_struct *work) > > -{ > > - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep; > > - struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn; > > - struct acpi_device *adev; > > - int state; > > - > > - dep = container_of(work, struct acpi_power_dependent_device, work); > > - adev = dep->adev; > > - if (acpi_power_get_inferred_state(adev, &state)) > > - return; > > - > > - if (state > ACPI_STATE_D0) > > - return; > > - > > - mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock); > > - > > - list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node) > > - pm_request_resume(pn->dev); > > - > > - list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->power_dependent, node) > > - pm_request_resume(pn->dev); > > - > > - mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock); > > -} > > - > > static int __acpi_power_on(struct acpi_power_resource *resource) > > { > > acpi_status status = AE_OK; > > @@ -283,14 +250,8 @@ static int acpi_power_on_unlocked(struct > > resource->name)); > > } else { > > result = __acpi_power_on(resource); > > - if (result) { > > + if (result) > > resource->ref_count--; > > - } else { > > - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep; > > - > > - list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependent, node) > > - schedule_work(&dep->work); > > - } > > } > > return result; > > } > > @@ -390,52 +351,6 @@ static int acpi_power_on_list(struct lis > > return result; > > } > > > > -static void acpi_power_add_dependent(struct acpi_power_resource *resource, > > - struct acpi_device *adev) > > -{ > > - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep; > > - > > - mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock); > > - > > - list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependent, node) > > - if (dep->adev == adev) > > - goto out; > > - > > - dep = kzalloc(sizeof(*dep), GFP_KERNEL); > > - if (!dep) > > - goto out; > > - > > - dep->adev = adev; > > - INIT_WORK(&dep->work, acpi_power_resume_dependent); > > - list_add_tail(&dep->node, &resource->dependent); > > - > > - out: > > - mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock); > > -} > > - > > -static void acpi_power_remove_dependent(struct acpi_power_resource > > *resource, > > - struct acpi_device *adev) > > -{ > > - struct acpi_power_dependent_device *dep; > > - struct work_struct *work = NULL; > > - > > - mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock); > > - > > - list_for_each_entry(dep, &resource->dependent, node) > > - if (dep->adev == adev) { > > - list_del(&dep->node); > > - work = &dep->work; > > - break; > > - } > > - > > - mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock); > > - > > - if (work) { > > - cancel_work_sync(work); > > - kfree(dep); > > - } > > -} > > - > > static struct attribute *attrs[] = { > > NULL, > > }; > > @@ -524,8 +439,6 @@ static void acpi_power_expose_hide(struc > > > > void acpi_power_add_remove_device(struct acpi_device *adev, bool add) > > { > > - struct acpi_device_power_state *ps; > > - struct acpi_power_resource_entry *entry; > > int state; > > > > if (adev->wakeup.flags.valid) > > @@ -535,16 +448,6 @@ void acpi_power_add_remove_device(struct > > if (!adev->power.flags.power_resources) > > return; > > > > - ps = &adev->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0]; > > - list_for_each_entry(entry, &ps->resources, node) { > > - struct acpi_power_resource *resource = entry->resource; > > - > > - if (add) > > - acpi_power_add_dependent(resource, adev); > > - else > > - acpi_power_remove_dependent(resource, adev); > > - } > > - > > for (state = ACPI_STATE_D0; state <= ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT; state++) > > acpi_power_expose_hide(adev, > > &adev->power.states[state].resources, > > @@ -882,7 +785,6 @@ int acpi_add_power_resource(acpi_handle > > acpi_init_device_object(device, handle, ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER, > > ACPI_STA_DEFAULT); > > mutex_init(&resource->resource_lock); > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->dependent); > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->list_node); > > resource->name = device->pnp.bus_id; > > strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_POWER_DEVICE_NAME); > > > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
