On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 21.10.13 at 16:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > >>> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper <daniel.ki...@oracle.com> wrote:
[...] > >> > What do you think about that? > >> > Any comments, suggestions, objections? > >> > >> The complications here make it pretty clear to me that the > >> GrUB2-less solution (or, if GruB2 absolutely has to be involved, > >> its chain loading capability) I have been advocating continues > >> to be the better (and, as said before, conceptually correct) > >> model. > > > > However my understanding is that the general distro approach is > > to use GRUB2 and I think we want to follow the mainstream on this. > > Which means using GRUB2 and making sense of the myrid of patches > > that each distro has. > > As does ours - and we simply use the chain loading mechanism as > I'm told (and as I suggested - I'm only occasionally involved in the > secure boot stuff). Do you think about GRUB2 chainloader command? Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/