On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 10:25am -0500, Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04 2013 at 10:06am -0500, > > Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The code uses atomic_inc for restoration of bi_remaining. This patch > > > changes it to atomic_set(1) to avoid an interlocked instruction. In the > > > target's bi_endio routine we are sure that bi_remaining is zero > > > (otherwise, the bi_endio routine wouldn't be called) and there are no > > > concurrent users of the bio, so we can replace atomic_inc with > > > atomic_set(1). > > > > This isn't DM-specific. Shouldn't the other places in the tree that use > > atomic_inc on bi_remaining should really be converted at the same time? > > There is no 'atomic_inc.*bi_remaining' in other drivers. Wrong. I know btrfs has at least one. As does bcache afaik. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
