On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:44:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > long head = ((__atomic long)pc->data_head).load(memory_order_acquire); > > coupled with: > > ((__atomic long)pc->data_tail).store(tail, memory_order_release); > > might be the 'right' and proper C11 incantations to avoid having to > touch kernel macros; but would obviously require a recent compiler. > > Barring that, I think we're stuck with: > > long head = ACCESS_ONCE(pc->data_head); > smp_rmb(); > > ... > > smp_mb(); > pc->data_tail = tail; > > And using the right asm goo for the barriers. That said, all these asm > barriers should include a compiler barriers (memory clobber) which > _should_ avoid the worst compiler trickery -- although I don't think it > completely obviates the need for ACCESS_ONCE() -- uncertain there.
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/single-producer-single-consumer-queue/ There's one for icc on x86. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
