On 11/06/2013 02:33 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 03:42:20 -0500 (EST) Jerome Marchand <jmarc...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> That was my first version of this patch (actually "kbytes" to avoid >> overflow). >> Dave raised the issue that it silently breaks the user interface: >> overcommit_ratio is zero while the system behaves differently. > > I don't understand that at all. We keep overcommit_ratio as-is, with > the same default values and add a different way of altering it. That > should be back-compatible?
Reading the old thread, I think my main point was that we shouldn't output overcommit_ratio=0 when overcommit_bytes>0. We need to round up for numbers less than 1 so that folks don't think overcommit_ratio is _off_. I was really just trying to talk you in to cramming the extra precision in to the _existing_ sysctl. :) I don't think bytes vs. ratio is really that big of a deal. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
