On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 01:50:27 +0100 Hannes Frederic Sowa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply, but this was sent while I was getting ready > > for my two week conference trip. > > > > Note, this should not go through the net tree, but instead should go > > through tip, as it deals with jump labels and not networking. > > > > Otherwise, this patch looks good. > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > > Thanks for the review! > > The patch already got queued up in net-next. Is this ok or what do you > suggest to resolve this? > I'm fine, but really. Changes need to go through the trees they are maintained by. Would Dave Miller like it if I pushed patches that touched the net directory without a single Ack? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
