[PATCH 3.4 09/26] can: flexcan: flexcan_chip_start: fix regression, mark one MB for TX and abort pending TX

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>

commit d5a7b406c529e4595ce03dc8f6dcf7fa36f106fa upstream.

In patch

    0d1862e can: flexcan: fix flexcan_chip_start() on imx6

the loop in flexcan_chip_start() that iterates over all mailboxes after the
soft reset of the CAN core was removed. This loop put all mailboxes (even the
ones marked as reserved 1...7) into EMPTY/INACTIVE mode. On mailboxes 8...63,
this aborts any pending TX messages.

After a cold boot there is random garbage in the mailboxes, which leads to
spontaneous transmit of CAN frames during first activation. Further if the
interface was disabled with a pending message (usually due to an error
condition on the CAN bus), this message is retransmitted after enabling the
interface again.

This patch fixes the regression by:
1) Limiting the maximum number of used mailboxes to 8, 0...7 are used by the RX
FIFO, 8 is used by TX.
2) Marking the TX mailbox as EMPTY/INACTIVE, so that any pending TX of that
mailbox is aborted.

Cc: Lothar Waßmann <l...@karo-electronics.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/can/flexcan.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 #define FLEXCAN_MCR_BCC                        BIT(16)
 #define FLEXCAN_MCR_LPRIO_EN           BIT(13)
 #define FLEXCAN_MCR_AEN                        BIT(12)
-#define FLEXCAN_MCR_MAXMB(x)           ((x) & 0xf)
+#define FLEXCAN_MCR_MAXMB(x)           ((x) & 0x1f)
 #define FLEXCAN_MCR_IDAM_A             (0 << 8)
 #define FLEXCAN_MCR_IDAM_B             (1 << 8)
 #define FLEXCAN_MCR_IDAM_C             (2 << 8)
@@ -701,9 +701,11 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net
         *
         */
        reg_mcr = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
+       reg_mcr &= ~FLEXCAN_MCR_MAXMB(0xff);
        reg_mcr |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT |
                FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV | FLEXCAN_MCR_WRN_EN |
-               FLEXCAN_MCR_IDAM_C | FLEXCAN_MCR_SRX_DIS;
+               FLEXCAN_MCR_IDAM_C | FLEXCAN_MCR_SRX_DIS |
+               FLEXCAN_MCR_MAXMB(FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID);
        netdev_dbg(dev, "%s: writing mcr=0x%08x", __func__, reg_mcr);
        flexcan_write(reg_mcr, &regs->mcr);
 
@@ -744,6 +746,10 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net
                        &regs->cantxfg[i].can_ctrl);
        }
 
+       /* Abort any pending TX, mark Mailbox as INACTIVE */
+       flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MB_CNT_CODE(0x4),
+                     &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_ctrl);
+
        /* acceptance mask/acceptance code (accept everything) */
        flexcan_write(0x0, &regs->rxgmask);
        flexcan_write(0x0, &regs->rx14mask);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/