On 11/09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > In that case, I suggest you to use "@+addr" for the relative address, > since that is an offset, isn't that? :)
Agreed, @+addr looks better! > BTW, it seems that @addr syntax is hard to use for uprobes, because > current uprobes is based on a binary, not a process, we cannot specify > which process is probed when we define it. Yes, exactly. That is why we suggest that user-space should pass the ip-relative address (actually offset). This should hopefully solve all problems with relocations. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
