On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:38:24AM +0000, Wang, Xiaoming wrote:
> Dear Paul
>       How about moving cfs_rq->nr_running into loop. What I worried is that 
> cfs_rq->nr_running
> may zero because cfs_rq is coming from cfs_rq = group_cfs_rq(se) again. We 
> haven't known the 
> reproduction exactly, panic happened only on random test and unstable. 

No; its just plain wrong. If this new condition can be true there's
something fundamentally messed up and we need to figure out what causes
that, not try and paper it over.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to