Hi Mark,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Vinayak,
>
> On 13/11/13 11:05, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>> This patch adds an accessor function for IRQ_PER_CPU flag.
>> The accessor function is useful to dertermine whether an IRQ is percpu or
>> not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vk...@apm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
>> index 56fb646..acd8a3f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
>> @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ static inline int irq_balancing_disabled(unsigned int
>> irq)
>> return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_NO_BALANCING_MASK;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int irq_is_percpu(unsigned int irq)
>> +{
>> + struct irq_desc *desc;
>> +
>> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>> + return (desc && (desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU)) ? 1 : 0;
>
> I don't think it is worth checking for the validity of "desc" here. All
> the other accessors assume that you've not passed a stupid "irq" value.
hmm..Okay, will remove the 'desc' validity check from here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
