> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk....@samsung.com>
Function looks good to me. But some nitpicking below for code cleanup..
> @@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ static int check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t
> pgofs,
return value could be boolean?
> pgoff_t start_fofs, end_fofs;
> block_t start_blkaddr;
>
> + if (is_inode_flag_set(fi, FI_NO_EXTENT))
> + return 0;
> +
> read_lock(&fi->ext.ext_lock);
> if (fi->ext.len == 0) {
> read_unlock(&fi->ext.ext_lock);
> @@ -109,6 +112,7 @@ void update_extent_cache(block_t blk_addr, struct
> dnode_of_data *dn)
> struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(dn->inode);
> pgoff_t fofs, start_fofs, end_fofs;
> block_t start_blkaddr, end_blkaddr;
> + int need_update = true;
bool?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
