Hi, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:59:35 +0100, Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Implement proper class names for input drivers. >
This patch probably should probably use atomic_inc in case we ever have non-serialized probe functions. But the real question is whether we really need class devices have unique names or we could do with inputX thus leaving individual drivers intact and only modifying the input core. As far as I understand userspace should be concerned only with device capabilities, not particular name, besides, it gets PRODUCT string which has all needed data encoded. What do you think? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
