+ Huang, Mark, SPI list There seem to be multiple efforts going on that are vaguely related. I'd like to see more of the same people appearing on the CC list, to keep better coordinated.
On that topic, is the SPI dev list relevant, or would anybody working on the intersection of SPI and MTD be on the MTD list? On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:22:37PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > The first bunch of these patches have been on the MLs before, but > didn't receive a great deal of attention for the most part. We are > a little more featureful this time however. We can now successfully > setup and configure the N25Q256. We still can't read/write/erase > it though. I'll start work on that next week and will provide it in > the next instalment. What happened to integrating a SPI NOR framework? I see you copied some of the m25p80 commands, but you don't share them with m25p80. I also understand your argument (from the first version of this patch series) that much of the actual controller operation is not shared with m25p80, but you'd be surprised how this might evolve. There are several others with QSPI hardware that are trying to get patches merged, some of whom (Huang, at least) are actively submitting patches to help with this abstraction. Now, I haven't had a lot of time yet to look at both yours and Huang's work and see what, if anything, can be shared (will do soon). But I think you need to be aware. BTW, can you include version markers (i.e., [PATCH v2 X/Y]) in the subject from now on? Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
