On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:32:32PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Generalize the function so that we can accommodate all three comparison
> methods: delta, ratio, and wdiff.

This patch basicaly factor the code you added in previous one.

Could we use the function below from the beggining?

jirka
> 
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> index fe6e200..20284c3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
> @@ -769,31 +769,44 @@ static int hpp__entry_baseline(struct hist_entry *he, 
> char *buf, size_t size)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int hpp__color_delta(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> -                     struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
> +static int __hpp__color_compare(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> +                             struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
> +                             int comparison_method)
>  {
>       struct diff_hpp_fmt *dfmt =
>               container_of(fmt, struct diff_hpp_fmt, fmt);
>       struct hist_entry *pair = get_pair_fmt(he, dfmt);
> -     double percent;
> +     double diff;
>       char pfmt[20] = " ";
>  
>       if (!pair)
>               goto dummy_print;
> -     if (pair->diff.computed)
> -             percent = pair->diff.period_ratio_delta;
> -     else
> -             percent = compute_delta(he, pair);
>  
> -     if (fabs(percent) >= 0.01) {
> +     switch(comparison_method){
> +     case COMPUTE_DELTA:
> +             if (pair->diff.computed)
> +                     diff = pair->diff.period_ratio_delta;
> +             else
> +                     diff = compute_delta(he, pair);
> +
> +             if (fabs(diff) < 0.01)
> +                     goto dummy_print;
>               scnprintf(pfmt, 20, "%%%+d.2f%%%%", dfmt->header_width - 1);
>               return color_snprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size,
> -                             percent > 0 ? PERF_COLOR_GREEN : PERF_COLOR_RED,
> -                             pfmt, percent);
> -     } else
> +                             diff > 0 ? PERF_COLOR_GREEN : PERF_COLOR_RED,
> +                             pfmt, diff);
> +     default:
> +             BUG_ON(1);
> +     }
>  dummy_print:
> -             return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s",
> -                             dfmt->header_width, pfmt);
> +     return scnprintf(hpp->buf, hpp->size, "%*s",
> +                     dfmt->header_width, pfmt);
> +}
> +
> +static int hpp__color_delta(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> +                     struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
> +{
> +     return __hpp__color_compare(fmt, hpp, he, COMPUTE_DELTA);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -- 
> 1.8.5.rc0.5.g70ebc73.dirty
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to