On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > The binary structure which changes every few weeks and which is shared
> > > between the bootloader and the kernel? Yeah, "somewhat broken" is one
> > > way of putting it :)
> > >
> > > The ARM kernel does it a lot better with tag,value pairs.
> >
> > As does m68k... That's why we never got beyond bootinfo major version 2.
>
> Out of interest, on ARM & m68k I would assume that the list of tag's gets
> added to over time?
That's true. But besides the recent conversion of the HP9000/[34]00 code to
use bootinfo, not much has changed during the last 5 years.
If a tag is not recognized, it's just ignored. That means your new feature
cannot be used by the kernel, but it doesn't break the bootloader<->kernel
interface the hard way.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
